Patrick Coffee with Mediabistro’s PRNewser is noticing a trend of large, well-known brands taking their social media engagement efforts in-house.
“The sneaker king {Nike} isn’t the only company to take a greater degree of responsibility for its own social media efforts in recent months,” Coffee writes. “Competitor Reebok conducted an internal audit of all its social channels after rejecting contract offers from agencies, and Digiday reports that other big names like Ford and Campbell’s Soup have done the same.”
So should contract public relations and digital strategists be worried about this trend? Not exactly.
In a Utopian society, all brands would handle their social networking and community management in-house. After all, who knows the company’s voice better than the staffs themselves? Unfortunately, this isn’t always practical.
Expecting all companies to handle social media engagement internally is like expecting them to handle all writing, public relations and advertising in-house. And that’s just not going to happen. Most of the time, it’s these entities that give and develop companies’ voices and make them resonate with customers.
Smaller brands will continue to struggle with this dilemma. On one hand, they may not think they can afford to outsource their social media efforts. But because they’re balancing social networking with the other daily tasks it takes to run their businesses, engaging customers and other audiences via social media will always suffer.
The big brands like Nike and Reebok are testing the waters and appointing internal teams to handle social media—and they have the budgets to do so. The question are going to be how large are these teams and how is the work being distributed among the members.
In a previous post, we talked about how a small, internal digital team could benefit from outsourced support. This is a prime example. An internal digital team at Nike or Reebok might be able to handle company-wide social media efforts on its own, but what happens when the needs of the company grow or when individual product lines within the company require their own social media management? Will this team be able to scale with the needs of the company and keep abreast of technology that seems to change by the second?
Successful social media engagement requires strategy that aligns with company goals, consistency, awareness of the latest trends and execution. Situations like these are the prime reason why we developed our Monarch product. The packages cover the smaller organization that’s just looking to get its feet wet using social media all the way to the more sophisticated and technologically savvy company that’s looking for a customized solution.
Coffee says that “insiders worry that this industry-wide shift will eventually bring PR/marketing firms’ profit margins down as brands hire more internal social media managers and outsource fewer and fewer tasks.” Only time will tell how permanent this shift will be.
In the meantime, he points out that Nike never said it was planning to “sever ties with all third-party firms.”
Share with us: Does your company outsource its social media engagement or is it looking to bring these duties in-house. If your company manages its social media internally, do you think the support of an external team could benefit your efforts?
Monarch is our content marketing and community engagement support product—a resource that backs you up and leaves you to free to do the job you’ve always done successfully. Monarch breaks engagement efforts into four packages that allocate set hours per month for content creation, community building and engagement. When you choose the package that works best for you, you know exactly what you’re getting per month and how much you’re paying for it.

















